Introduction
Missions involving public and private stakeholders have become common: security, maintenance, logistics, event management, training, technical interventions.
While the objectives are shared, the constraints, statuses, and responsibilities differ significantly between the parties.
Without a shared tool, coordination relies on emails, Excel files, and phone calls, leading to delays, misunderstandings, and legal risks.
A mixed public / private mission software allows for structuring this collaboration within a clear, secure, and operational framework.
Common Challenges of Public / Private Missions
Fragmented Organization
Each stakeholder uses their own tools:
- the local authority manages via internal dashboards,
- providers manage their teams separately,
- no consolidated view exists.
Result: wasted time and contradictory information.
Poorly Defined Responsibilities
Without a clear framework:
- roles overlap,
- decisions are poorly tracked,
- responsibilities become unclear in case of issues.
Ineffective Communication
Changes in scheduling or instructions are not always communicated to all involved parties, leading to errors and tensions in the field.
Concrete Use Case: A Mixed Operational Mission
Initial Situation
A local authority sets up a mission involving:
- an internal public service (management),
- several private companies (field execution),
- agents and stakeholders with different statuses.
Objectives:
- coordinate teams,
- ensure smooth execution,
- maintain strict control over the public framework.
Implementation of a Mixed Public / Private Mission Software
The local authority adopts a mixed public / private mission software like eBrigade to create a common working foundation, while respecting each party’s scope.
Each mission becomes a central structure bringing together:
- scheduling,
- teams,
- operational areas,
- operational instructions.
Centralized Coordination and Public Oversight
A Common Framework for All Stakeholders
The software allows for:
- define mission objectives,
- plan interventions,
- share essential information.
All involved parties work on the same basis, without duplicating platforms.
Controlled Oversight by the Public Stakeholder
The local authority retains:
- overall supervision,
- assignment validation,
- the ability to adjust the mission in real-time.
Everyone’s role is clearly defined.
Segregation of Roles and Access
Visibility Adapted to Roles
The software allows for:
- providing a complete view to public supervisors,
- limiting providers to their own missions,
- preventing access to sensitive internal data.
Collaboration is fluid without mixing scopes.
Smoother Field Execution
Shared and Reliable Scheduling
Field teams have:
- a clear schedule,
- up-to-date instructions,
- the necessary information for their mission.
Adjustments are immediately visible to the relevant personnel.
Observed Concrete Benefits
After deployment:
- 🤝 Improved public / private coordination
- 📅 Unique and reliable scheduling
- 🔐 Access and responsibility security
- ⏱️ Reduction of operational time loss
- 📊 Clear vision of mission progress
The mission gains in efficiency, clarity, and legal security.
Why This Use Case Is Strategic
Mixed public / private missions require:
- a common framework,
- clear governance,
- flawless execution.
A mixed public / private mission software allows for transforming complex collaboration into a controlled and high-performing process.
👉 Discover how a mixed public / private mission software can structure your collaborations and secure your operations.
